6 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (350 points)

ICE has a big impact on the Hispanic community and making them fear going out to work, go to the grocery store and even afraid of calling the police if they see any crime. "16% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided calling the police or reporting a crime for fear of being questioned about their legal status. Another 15% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided public places like parks or recreation areas, and 14% reported that they have avoided speaking Spanish in public. This survey also found that 10% of foreign-born Latinos are avoiding work situations where they might be asked about their citizenship status" (Brookings.edu, R.Sanchez. Gabriel, Edward D.Vargas, 2025) . These statistics aren't surprising especially with how ICE profiles them  "we asked respondents directly what a white border patrol agent whom they might encounter would assume their race to be, based on their skin color, hairstyle, or facial features." Gabriel R. Sanchez and Edward D.Vargas stated. This proves why many are affected and afraid stepping outside to do their day to day basis things, and has become a fear to many Hispanic/Latino adults but has also become a fear for many kids including those in elementary.

35 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (240 points)

After looking over the topic that ICE racially profiles, mainly the Hispanic/Latinx community, I found this to be true.

The evidence supporting this claim is statistical and comes from reputable sources. The original claim cites a Brookings Institution report that provides crucial survey data on the tangible fear within Latino communities. The report found that significant percentages of foreign-born Latinos avoid essential activities like calling the police, visiting public spaces, or speaking Spanish due to concerns about being questioned over their legal status. This data demonstrates the widespread impact of profiling, creating a climate of fear that affects daily life.

This statistical evidence is directly supported by recent legal and on-the-ground reporting. An NPR article confirms that a September 2025 Supreme Court ruling explicitly allows immigration agents to consider factors such as race and whether Spanish is spoken when making stops. This legal sanction of racial profiling provides a direct mechanism for the fears documented in the Brookings survey.

In conclusion, I’ve verified this claim to be true. The Brookings report establishes the pervasive fear and behavior changes within the Hispanic community, while the NPR reporting confirms that this fear is grounded in a real and recently upheld policy that leads to racial profiling of U.S. citizens based on their appearance.

Brookings article

NPR supreme court ruling

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

True, ice is currently racially profiling people of hispanic/latino decent. This is especially happening in the Southern California area where there is a high latino population. A heat map has been made by the coalition for human immigrant rights that over 400 people have been affected by the ice raids. Statistically the hispanic race has been detained far more than any other race. Because of the profiling that had been taken place ice agents are looking at skin color before anything else since there has been American citizens that have been detained as well. This is an un going problem that needs to stop, everyone should be treated equal. 

 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/24/us/ice-race-ethnicity-immigration.html

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-07-22/data-shows-evidence-of-racial-profiling-in-ice-raids-immigrant-rights-group-says

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (610 points)

Unfortunately, the claim that ICE racially profiles mainly Hispanic/Latinx communities is true. In the case of Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, the Supreme Court quoted the district court’s conclusion that federal agents were stopping individuals based solely on four factors: “their apparent race or ethnicity; … whether they spoke Spanish or English with an accent; … the type of location … (such as a car wash or bus stop); and … the type of job they appeared to work.” These statements indicate an official recognition (from the Supreme Court) that enforcement practices are being applied disproportionately against Hispanic/Latinx individuals as opposed to any other racial community, using targeting strategies and profiling specific to Hispanic/Latinx communities. 

Sources: 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf 

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/racial-profiling-by-ice-will-have-a-marked-impact-on-latino-communities/

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (310 points)

Sadly, the claim is correct. Brookings, a very reputable non-profit with a focus on governance and research, made the statement. To support their claims, the writers only cite primary sources, including government records and other research and polls.

The Supreme Court's decision in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo is a significant document that is mentioned in the article. The Court affirms that "their apparent race or ethnicity, whether they spoke Spanish or English with an accent, the type of location at which they were found, and the type of job where they appeared to work" could be used to determine whether someone is a person of interest (Noem v. Perdomo). ICE officials were urged to make arrests if there was a possibility that the individual they were holding was a citizen, according to a dissenting judge.

Furthermore, the difference between nationalities was evident right away while accessing the official ICE website. A map under the "U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Removals Statistics" section shows the nations from where the bulk of people deported as of May 2025 originated. More than 200,000 of these removals occur in Mexico, with Guatemala, Honduras, and numerous other South American nations following.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

https://www.ice.gov/statistics

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

Yes, the claim that ICE mainly targets the Hispanic or LatinX community is correct. They don't ONLY target that community, but the majority of their actions were aimed towards its members. The American Immigration Council discussed many examples of when ICE agents have directly targeted LatinX people, like how in a 2019 raid, "officers segregated and detained only those workers they perceived as Latino relying on racial profiling to conduct the operation," and left white-appearing individuals alone. In a statistics page by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, you can see how spanish-speaking countries, like Mexico and El Salvador, have a much higher population of detainees when compared to typically white countries like Germany and Poland. Guatemala had the highest amount of expulsions, followed by Mexico and Honduras. Additionally, the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs stated that "Latinos accounted for nine out of ten [ICE] arrests during the first six months of 2025." The targeting of hispanics increased under the Trump administration as well, with "an average of 558 Latino arrests per day compared with 276 during the pre-Trump period' in his first hundred days. There isn't much data that argues with this claim, in fact all pieces of hard, statistical data prove it to be true.

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...