4 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (330 points)

ICE has a big impact on the Hispanic community and making them fear going out to work, go to the grocery store and even afraid of calling the police if they see any crime. "16% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided calling the police or reporting a crime for fear of being questioned about their legal status. Another 15% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided public places like parks or recreation areas, and 14% reported that they have avoided speaking Spanish in public. This survey also found that 10% of foreign-born Latinos are avoiding work situations where they might be asked about their citizenship status" (Brookings.edu, R.Sanchez. Gabriel, Edward D.Vargas, 2025) . These statistics aren't surprising especially with how ICE profiles them  "we asked respondents directly what a white border patrol agent whom they might encounter would assume their race to be, based on their skin color, hairstyle, or facial features." Gabriel R. Sanchez and Edward D.Vargas stated. This proves why many are affected and afraid stepping outside to do their day to day basis things, and has become a fear to many Hispanic/Latino adults but has also become a fear for many kids including those in elementary.

13 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)

This claim, unfortunately, is true. Looking a the cited article from the claim, Brookings found 16% of Latino respondents avoided calling the police out of fear of being detained. Brookings is a legit non-profit research organization that prides itself on being non-partisan. This means the linked source from the claim is likely aiming to be as non-biased as possible. I also looked into recent events of racial profiling and came across an article from the American Immigration Council about a Supreme Court ruling in LA. The article cited the Noem v. Vasquez ruling, which overruled a previous ruling that prohibited immigration officers from detaining suspected illegal immigrants based on race or ethnicity. I was able to find the ruling report from both the concurring and dissenting perspectives. In the concurring report by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, he wrote, "The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes immigration officers to 'interrogate any alien or person believed to be an alien as to his right to be or to remain in the United States.'" He later cited the 4th Amendment as a reason for these stops. The dissenting report also states that it was the "Government's application" for this appeal, meaning the US government called for the appeal and not any real legal processes. According to the article from the American Immigration Council, this ruling essentially gives ICE agents the "green light" to detain suspected illegal immigrants, and does not prohibit racial profiling. The concurring report also called ethnicity a "relevant factor" for detaining suspected illegal immigrants. 

The dissenting opinion of the ruling called out the hypocrisy of the Noem v. Vasquez ruling, citing the earlier ruling, which prohibited racial profiling in detaining suspected illegal immigrants. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissenting report:

"..a majority of this Court decides to take the once-extraordinary step of staying the District Court’s order. That decision is yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket. We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job. Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent."

As another commentator pointed out, the ruling not only allows racial profiling but also seems to encourage it. Justice Kavanaugh's ruling also seems to be biased, as he also claimed in his report that many illegal immigrants were coming into the country to cause harm. It seems policymakers are including their own prejudices in their endorsement of racial profiling by immigration officers. 

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (290 points)

After doing research I came to the conclusion that this article is true. Brooks is a reliable non profit organization in which they do in depth analysis on policy on a worldwide level, they have a slight left bias but nonetheless its a very credible source. They did claim that a recent supreme court decision has allowed for this racial profiling to happen and they referenced the official supreme court document which I will link at the bottom of this entry. I have found an article by The Guardian that supports this article as it says that this racial profiling has affected daily life, "Some US citizens of colour have decided to change the way they live their day to day lives … carrying identification cards at all times or choosing not to speak languages other than English in public.”(The Guardian). The Guardian has a affiliation with this due to their slight left leaning morale in which they stand against ice and the racial profiling of immigrants. To further back these claims in the official supreme court document they claim, "The goverment sometimes makes brief investigative stops to check theimmigration status of those who gather in locations where people are hired for day jobs; who work or appear to work in jobs such as construction, landscaping, agriculture, or carwashes that often do not require paperwork and are therefore attractive to illegal immigrants.."(SupremeCourt.gov). This provides further explanation as to why foreign born lations are avoiding public places such as these. 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/23/citizens-permanent-residents-racial-profiling-ice-immigration

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)

After looking into this claim it looks to be true. The author of this claim cited Brookings as their source. Brookings is a real source that is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C with a mission to conduct in-depth nonpartisan research to improve policy and governance at local, national, and global levels. In the article, they use sources such as a Supreme Court Ruling Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo. Where this decision allows for ICE to racially profile by what car people drive, where they seem to work, if they speak Spanish or English, and by their apparent race or ethnicity. The claim also uses statistics that are indeed in the article. These percentages were collected by the Pew Research Center, which is a well-known reliable source.  In conclusion this claim is true due to the evidence it has to back it up and the use of credible sources helps with making sure the claim is true.

Sources:

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/racial-profiling-by-ice-will-have-a-marked-impact-on-latino-communities/

https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2023/09/20/latinos-views-of-and-experiences-with-the-spanish-language/

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...