ICE racially profiles mainly the Hispanic/Latinx community

Question

ICE has a big impact on the Hispanic community and making them fear going out to work, go to the grocery store and even afraid of calling the police if they see any crime. "16% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided calling the police or reporting a crime for fear of being questioned about their legal status. Another 15% of foreign-born Latinos have avoided public places like parks or recreation areas, and 14% reported that they have avoided speaking Spanish in public. This survey also found that 10% of foreign-born Latinos are avoiding work situations where they might be asked about their citizenship status" (Brookings.edu, R.Sanchez. Gabriel, Edward D.Vargas, 2025) . These statistics aren't surprising especially with how ICE profiles them  "we asked respondents directly what a white border patrol agent whom they might encounter would assume their race to be, based on their skin color, hairstyle, or facial features." Gabriel R. Sanchez and Edward D.Vargas stated. This proves why many are affected and afraid stepping outside to do their day to day basis things, and has become a fear to many Hispanic/Latino adults but has also become a fear for many kids including those in elementary.

Answer 1

After looking over the topic that ICE racially profiles, mainly the Hispanic/Latinx community, I found this to be true.

The evidence supporting this claim is statistical and comes from reputable sources. The original claim cites a Brookings Institution report that provides crucial survey data on the tangible fear within Latino communities. The report found that significant percentages of foreign-born Latinos avoid essential activities like calling the police, visiting public spaces, or speaking Spanish due to concerns about being questioned over their legal status. This data demonstrates the widespread impact of profiling, creating a climate of fear that affects daily life.

This statistical evidence is directly supported by recent legal and on-the-ground reporting. An NPR article confirms that a September 2025 Supreme Court ruling explicitly allows immigration agents to consider factors such as race and whether Spanish is spoken when making stops. This legal sanction of racial profiling provides a direct mechanism for the fears documented in the Brookings survey.

In conclusion, I’ve verified this claim to be true. The Brookings report establishes the pervasive fear and behavior changes within the Hispanic community, while the NPR reporting confirms that this fear is grounded in a real and recently upheld policy that leads to racial profiling of U.S. citizens based on their appearance.

Brookings article

NPR supreme court ruling

Answer 2

True, ice is currently racially profiling people of hispanic/latino decent. This is especially happening in the Southern California area where there is a high latino population. A heat map has been made by the coalition for human immigrant rights that over 400 people have been affected by the ice raids. Statistically the hispanic race has been detained far more than any other race. Because of the profiling that had been taken place ice agents are looking at skin color before anything else since there has been American citizens that have been detained as well. This is an un going problem that needs to stop, everyone should be treated equal. 

 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/24/us/ice-race-ethnicity-immigration.html

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-07-22/data-shows-evidence-of-racial-profiling-in-ice-raids-immigrant-rights-group-says

Answer 3

Unfortunately, the claim that ICE racially profiles mainly Hispanic/Latinx communities is true. In the case of Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, the Supreme Court quoted the district court’s conclusion that federal agents were stopping individuals based solely on four factors: “their apparent race or ethnicity; … whether they spoke Spanish or English with an accent; … the type of location … (such as a car wash or bus stop); and … the type of job they appeared to work.” These statements indicate an official recognition (from the Supreme Court) that enforcement practices are being applied disproportionately against Hispanic/Latinx individuals as opposed to any other racial community, using targeting strategies and profiling specific to Hispanic/Latinx communities. 

Sources: 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf 

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/racial-profiling-by-ice-will-have-a-marked-impact-on-latino-communities/

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text

Answer 4

Sadly, the claim is correct. Brookings, a very reputable non-profit with a focus on governance and research, made the statement. To support their claims, the writers only cite primary sources, including government records and other research and polls.

The Supreme Court's decision in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo is a significant document that is mentioned in the article. The Court affirms that "their apparent race or ethnicity, whether they spoke Spanish or English with an accent, the type of location at which they were found, and the type of job where they appeared to work" could be used to determine whether someone is a person of interest (Noem v. Perdomo). ICE officials were urged to make arrests if there was a possibility that the individual they were holding was a citizen, according to a dissenting judge.

Furthermore, the difference between nationalities was evident right away while accessing the official ICE website. A map under the "U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Removals Statistics" section shows the nations from where the bulk of people deported as of May 2025 originated. More than 200,000 of these removals occur in Mexico, with Guatemala, Honduras, and numerous other South American nations following.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf

https://www.ice.gov/statistics