0 like 0 dislike
ago by Titan (27.9k points)
edited ago by
The Ukrainian government still never claimed responsibility for the Odessa trade union fire that happened on May 2nd, 2014 when Right-Sector and Pro-Government “Maidan self-defense units” members set fire to a trade union building that killed 48 protesters.

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (600 points)

Upon searching up the Odessa Trade Union Fires, I found an articles from BBC, OHCHR, and the American Society of International Law. From what I understand, far right protesters who were either pro-maiden (wanted United Ukraine) or anti-maiden (wanted Russian seperation), and the pro-maiden group set fire to the anti-maiden camp in the Trade Unions House. The local police were recorded having a poor/slow response, only starting to make arrests after 41 people had already passed. This claim is true in stating that 48 people passed. While most people believe that the people who set the fire were all in the pro-maiden group, BBC stated that eyewitnesses confirmed many of the people were ordinary citizens. The police lacks of intervention is confirmed by BBC and OHCHR. Both sides were throwing molotov cocktails at the building. While it isn't an apology, the Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk critisized the police for the lack of intervention and failure to protect the people. While Ukraine seemingly admitted fault, they did not apologize. As reported by the American Society for International Law, Ukraine was found guilty of failing to protect citizens given they knew an attack was likely and did not send extra law enforcement in advance, leading to the death of 48 people. I did not find any statements from the Ukrainian government responding aside from the prime minister's response reported by BBC. None of the sources I used have been reported to have any significant political leaning which would alter the crediblity of their reports. When I reached out to the user on BlueSky they did not respond.

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...