1 like 0 dislike
by Titan (25.9k points)
edited by
Los Angeles citizens chasing ICE thugs

I have a feeling we'll be seeing more of this. People are fed up.

3 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (150 points)

Think of this as your investigation log. Answer each question to explain what you discovered and how you got there.

1. Write a brief overall summary of your findings. 

There isn't strong evidence showing that Los Angeles citizens are actually chasing ICE agents in a widespread way. The claim comes from single social media post, and there's no confirmation from reliable news sources. Because of that, the claim seems misleading or exaggerated. 


2. What primary sources did you find (e.g., transcripts, videos of politician speeches, tweets from public figures, scientific studies)? For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.

http://bsky.app/profile/moments2remember.link/post/3mhzmrvprwc2m

This post is where the claim comes from. It suggests that people in Los Angeles are chasing ICE agents, but it doesn't give clear details like when or where this happened. It Also, doesn't provide strong proof, so it's hard to know if this is a real pattern or just on situation taken out of context. 


3. What secondary sources did you find (e.g., newspapers, magazines)? Only use secondary sources if sufficient primary sources are not available. For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.

http://news.google.com/

I searched for recent news about this and didn't find any major outlets reporting that citizens are chasing ICE agents. If something like this was actually happening on a large scale, it would likely be covered by multiple sources.


4. What potential biases or interests might each of your sources have?

The wording in the post shows a strong opinion, which could mean the situation is being presented in a biased or exaggerated way. Social media posts often reflect personal views, so they're not always reliable or neutral sources of information.


5. What evidence supports the claim you are fact-checking?

The only thing supporting the claim is the original post itself. It might show a specific moment, but it doesn't prove that this is happening broadly across Los Angeles. 


6. What evidence undermines the claim you are fact-checking?

There's no confirmation from multiple credible sources. Also, no major news outlets are reporting this, which makes the claim less believable. The lack of details and context also weakens it. 


7. What happened when you tried contacting the person or group who made the original claim? (Always try to contact them—it’s okay if you don’t get a reply. For example, if the claim is that the president said something, try reaching out to the administration. If it was a Bluesky user, message that user on Bluesky.)

I didn't reach out to the original poster, but without more information or evidence from them, the claim remains unverified.

Exaggerated/ Misleading
ago by Newbie (480 points)
0 0
When you were looking for secondary sourced why did you choose to cite Google News instead of an article that was giving a counterargument or talking about what the LA people were actually doing? I understand that the original claim only had a single social media post to back it up, so your argument that its an exaggerated position may be better understood/supported if you had some news articles that talked about the situation in LA and how citizens are not actively chasing ICE agents.
ago by (140 points)
0 0
I think you could have dug deeper and found a better source for your argument. You searched the internet but couldn't find any sources that covered this, but there are plenty out there showing this claim is false. Other than this I agree that the original claim was misleading.
ago by (140 points)
0 0
I think this answer is great and i like how you added extra links for more evidence
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)

Think of this as your investigation log. Answer each question to explain what you discovered and how you got there.

1. Write a brief overall summary of your findings.  

The claim is that the video showing the Los Angeles ice agents is misleading. While the video itself is real, it was filmed in Mexico and Los Angeles, nor ice were involved. 

2. What primary sources did you find (e.g., transcripts, videos of politician speeches, tweets from public figures, scientific studies)? For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.

1.)https://bsky.app/profile/moments2remember.link/post/3mhzmrvprwc2m. This video makes the claim but provides no proof. Its just talking.

2.)https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-video-allegedly-showing-233600145.html

This video confirms the video is made in Mexico, but it did not include ice nor LA

3. What secondary sources did you find (e.g., newspapers, magazines)? Only use secondary sources if sufficient primary sources are not available. For each source, write at least one or two sentences explaining what you learned. Include all links.
4. What potential biases or interests might each of your sources have?
5. What evidence supports the claim you are fact-checking?
6. What evidence undermines the claim you are fact-checking?
7. What happened when you tried contacting the person or group who made the original claim? (Always try to contact them—it’s okay if you don’t get a reply. For example, if the claim is that the president said something, try reaching out to the administration. If it was a Bluesky user, message that user on Bluesky.)

False
ago by Innovator (64.1k points)
0 0
I don't see your responses to the questions. The fact-check feels a bit incomplete.
ago by (140 points)
0 0
I agree with your fact checking of this claim being misleading. However both your sources were not very good, they didn't support your claim of it being misleading well and didn't add to the fact that this original claim was false. There is also a lack of information and your fact checking seems to be incomplete.
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)
After doing some research you can tell that this post is false. The link to the post talking about Los Angeles citizens chasing ICE agents is completely untrue and this video takes place in Mexico.

https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/estados/a-jitomatazos-y-golpes-comerciantes-se-enfrentan-a-la-guardia-civil-estatal-en-central-de-abastos-de-slp-detienen-a-5/

This is the link that shows where the video originally came from. When reading the article you can see that it shows citizens of San Luis Potosi, Mexico are chasing and attacking the State Civil Guard. This attacking was eventually resolved and ended in the arrest of multiple people.

https://www.nacion321.com/ciudadanos/2026/02/12/video-rina-entre-diableros-y-guardia-civil-en-la-central-de-abastos-de-slp-deja-3-detenidos/

Here is a secondary source showing the truth of the situation. It has pretty much the same information as the first source and proves that this attack was neither on ice or in Los Angeles.

There is no bias in either of my sources. This is not a topic that would have a certain bias as there is video evidence of what is happening.

The video in both articles supports that this claim is false. In the video you can see that the background art is in Spanish and the guards have Spanish vest on.

The evidence that undermines the claim I am fact checking is that all signs in the video and in both article show and prove that the claim is completely false.

I didn't receive a response from the creator.
False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...