You say that "WSJ may have some bias based on its reliance on unnamed U.S officials which means the information could reflect the government’s perspective", as if this is a true bias but ultimately for what the information is, does it not need to be the government's perspective? Since it is the government who are the ones sending the paratroopers, I feel like it's less about bias and more just an objective truth about whether or not the government is doing this. Which since this has been proven through your fact check, they are.