0 like 0 dislike
ago in General Factchecking by (120 points)

The fast fashion chain is directly linked to environmental pollution due to the use of material and immediate disposal. The extensive resource extraction is also a definitive issue. A huge issue with fast fashion is the massive use of water and the waste water that particularly is used with the making of textiles. The industry produces 92 million tonnes of waste a year. And beyond just waste water, the industry also has a huge impact on CO2 emissions. 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-020-0039-9

6 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)
1. Summary of Findings:

This claim is TRUE. Fast fashion is indeed damaging to the environment through multiple pathways.

2. Primary Sources Found:

- Nature.com article (nature.com/articles/s43017-020-0039-9): Peer-reviewed research documenting that the fast fashion industry produces 92 million tonnes of textile waste annually. The industry uses massive amounts of water and generates significant waste water pollution during the dyeing and processing of textiles.

- Environmental impact data shows fast fashion accounts for 10% of global carbon dioxide emissions, a substantial contribution to climate change.

- The industry's dependence on rapid production and disposal creates a cycle of resource extraction and waste accumulation that harms ecosystems and contributes to water pollution.

The evidence overwhelmingly supports this claim, making it true based on scientific research and environmental data.
True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)


1. Write a brief overall summary of your findings.

"Fast Fashion is the second biggest consumer of water and is responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions - more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined" (earth.org, 2026). Fast fashion companies use low-cost materials to recreate current fashion trends, to quickly put them into stores and capitalize on these trends. This industry dries up water sources and pollutes rivers and streams, while 85% of the textiles are sent to dumps each year (Business Insider, McFall-Johnson). Fast fashion impacts the environment by using non-renewable resources, emitting greenhouse gasses, and using tremendous amounts of water and energy. 
2. Primary Sources

https://earth.org/fast-fashions-detrimental-effect-on-the-environment/

https://www.businessinsider.com/fast-fashion-environmental-impact-pollution-emissions-waste-water-2019-10

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

The claim that fast fashion is bad for the environment is true. Earth.org says, "Fast fashion is the second-biggest consumer of water and responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions – more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined." Fast fashion is uses 93 billion cubic meters of water, which is enough to meet the water consumption of five million people. Fast fashion is also responsible for eight to ten percent of global emissions, which is more than the aviation and shipping industries combined. At this pace, fast fashion will surge by more than 50 percent by 2030. Making plastic fibers into textiles is also incredibly energy intensive and relies on large amounts of fossil fuel, transporting fast fashion garments also uses a lot of energy and creates carbon emissions, many fast fashion brands use synthetic non-biodegradable fibers which harm marine ecosystems, aquatic life, and human health, and many discarded garments end up in landfills. Overall, every single part and step of fast fashion is bad for the environment which is proven by these trusted sources.

https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/un-alliance-sustainable-fashion-addresses-damage-fast-fashion

https://davidsuzuki.org/living-green/the-environmental-cost-of-fast-fashion/

https://earth.org/fast-fashions-detrimental-effect-on-the-environment/

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

This claim that fast fashion is bad for the environment is correct. The majority of fashion companies outsource their labor from developing countries because the labor is less expensive. To reduce costs the clothing is made of poor materials like polyester which is essentially plastic which will not decompose. As a result of using bad materials the quality is poor and the clothing doesn’t last, it ends up in landfills or waterways because of their short lifespan and limited use. This causes massive amounts of clothing to end up in landfills or contribute to water pollution through microplastics and textile waste. Many credible environmental research like from UCLA  and from University of Pennsylvania supports the claim that fast fashion has significant negative environmental impacts.

https://sustain.ucla.edu/2024/02/16/the-fast-fashion-epidemic/

https://environment.upenn.edu/news-events/news/fast-fashion

 

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (600 points)

Yes, fast fashion is bad for the environment. Based on an article published by Wildlife & Welfare (https://www.wildlifeandwelfare.org/news-blog/fast-fashion?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22913788547&gbraid=0AAAAAo4wE3Xye6CPvQst3cQDg9lAtvjvf&gclid=CjwKCAiA1obMBhAbEiwAsUBbIhhHTazNF44ekyewRpS4iWRz4AgckxcbwUXQlu5u8OpS9DHx9OI5ehoC5nQQAvD_BwE), fast fashion relies on cheap, high volume production that uses a lot of water and energy. Furthermore, this fast production also generates and emits greenhouse gas emissions, pollutes ecosystems with toxins, and creates massive textile waste that ends up just sitting in landfills. All of this has very harmful effects on our planet and environment.

True
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)

Yes, this claim is true. Fast Fashion is bad for the environment because of the "second-biggest consumer of water and responsible for about 10% of global carbon emissions" (Earth.Org). The article attached above also references the impact on global emissions, water waste, and chemical pollution that fast fashion creates, which Earth.Org backs up. This source could be seen as a bit biased, but a UCLA article has the same claims and even talks about the effects of producing clothing made of polyester, otherwise known as plastic, which does not decompose. 

Sources:

UCLA Sustainability
Earth.org
 

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...