1 like 1 dislike
in General Factchecking by (160 points)
It is not guaranteed, only speculations. This problem has occurred for decades and has never caused any overwhelming problems. The farthest they are speaking of going is to fine the team. For example, in the article linked, the SEC was one of the first targets for this 'issue'. Also, social media has a way of skewing the narrative into something it is not. I will not be convinced on topics unless it comes from the main source. As of now, nothing about this has come up from any NCAA, ESPN, or CFP committees.

18 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (250 points)
This information is misleading. The article says "The NCAA is banning fans from rushing football fields. This is false and misleading. Instead of impacting the fans instead the NCAA is fining the schools diffrent amounts of money. So therfore if Autzen Stadium (Home of the Oregon Ducks) was rushed after a big game instead of impacting the fans they could fine the school 50K.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)
After doing some research into these claims, I have deduced that as of right now, the SEC is the only conference to take serious action against rushing the field. This push for limiting and eventually banning field storming comes from the SEC commissioner, Greg Sankey. As for the other leagues and commissioners, nobody has made any serious moves to prevent field rushing. This means that, as for now, most of college football will still have the ability to rush the field, and as for the SEC teams, they can still participate in rushing, but at a significantly higher cost than it previously was.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45380660/sec-increases-fines-500k-rushing-field-court
Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)
After investigating the claim, I found accurate information from Sports Illustrated and ESPN analyzing the new rules in two major football conferences, the SEC and ACC. Both conferences will look to fine Universities that do not comply with the rules. In May of 2025, the SEC increased the fine for storming the field from a three strikes system to an automatic $500,000 fine. Their previous system charged $100,000 for the first offense, second offense was $250,000 and every time after would tax $500,000.

The ACC is applying a similar method to the SEC's previous three strikes policy. They fine a University $50,000 for the first offense, second time will cost them $100,000 and a third strike or any time following the third field storming will have a fee of $200,000.

It is important to understand that not all Universities and school have set rules to minimize field and court rushing. William Weinbaum from ESPN says that out of the 32 NCAA Division 1 conferences, more than half do not have the rules to enforce not storming a basketball court.

I conclude from my research that storming the field is not banned, however, it could cost your school a great deal of money.

https://www.si.com/college-football/acc-announces-plan-to-fine-schools-for-court-and-field-storming

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45380660/sec-increases-fines-500k-rushing-field-court

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/39603955/court-storming-division-conferences-college-basketball-policies-fines-injuries
False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (180 points)

The post is linked to an article from the Sports Business Journal, which is a trustworthy source for sports business news. However, the article never states that the NCAA is going to ban fans for storming the field. What it actually discusses is how some conferences, especially the SEC, are increasing the fines that schools have to pay when fans storm the field after games. This is a conference rule regarding fines for schools, not an NCAA rule to keep fans out of games. Researching other articles about this topic, it is apparent that several conferences have either considered or implemented these fines, but there is no information from the NCAA, ESPN, or the College Football Playoff regarding banning fans. Researching the origin of this claim reveals that this entire discussion is based on conference rules, not an NCAA rule. This claim is false because it takes a discussion about conference fines and turns it into a claim that the NCAA is going to ban fans, which is not true based on any evidence.

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (150 points)

The claim that the NCAA will ban fans for storming the field after games is not supported by sources with authority, instead research shows Conferences not the NCAA are setting and enforcing policies. These policies usually include fines and safety requirements rather than outright bans. The rules for the policy are getting stricter but the punishments are fines for the school, not criminal bans on fans.There’s also no central NCAA ban in place as of early 2026. 

Sources: https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2025/05/30/sec-changes-field-storming-policy/https://www.espn.in/college-football/story/_/id/46131359/florida-state-fined-50k-acc-storming-field-alabama-winhttps://www.reuters.com/sports/sec-says-all-fines-storming-field-court-now-500k--flm-2025-05-30/ 

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)

The SEC changed its “storm fielding” policy to prioritize the safety and accountability of individuals after repeated incidents of injuries and stolen valuables. The smaller fines that used to be given for storming a field after a victory of a home event did not do much for people to stop rushing the field. Not only does storming create dangerous conditions for players, coaches, officials, and fans, especially when the visiting team tries to leave and it is impossible, due to the high wave of home team fans, so the SEC implemented a fee to show how serious they were about people rushing the fields. This strict policy that the SEC has enforce is a way that will help schools promote the improvement of their crowd management, since fines can be avoided if visiting teams and officials exit safely before fans enter the field. A harsh example of this would be when Mississippi State was fined by the SEC $500,000 for its fans from rushing the field after a home game win against Arizona State.

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/46201308/mississippi-state-fined-500000-sec-field-storming 

False
0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (200 points)

This is not true. This article is only speculation about banning storming the field and does not report any official rule change prohibiting the practice. It states clearly that the SEC (not the NCAA) is changing the amount they are fining universities, and even then, the policy is focused on safety and logistics rather than eliminating field or court rushing altogether. The article explains that “if schools allow for visiting teams and officials to ‘exit the field of play before they rush the field or court, a fine will not be given,’” making it clear that rushing is still permitted under certain conditions. Sankey also noted that the increased frequency of court and field rushes over the past three years has “invoked ‘meaningful conversation’ about a policy change,” which suggests discussion rather than enforcement of a ban. He further clarified that to avoid fines there “must be no interactions ‘period’ between a visiting team and the rushing team’s fans,” reinforcing that the emphasis is on preventing contact, not stopping celebrations entirely.

False
ago by (100 points)
0 0

After investigating this claim, I found that it is misleading. While conferences like the SEC have increased fines and penalties related to field-storming incidents, there is no confirmed NCAA policy that bans individual fans from attending games for storming the field. The claim exaggerates enforcement actions and presents speculation as fac The claim appears to come from social media and secondary sports commentary rather than an official NCAA announcement. No official NCAA press release or policy staement confirms a nationwide ban on fans for field storming Coverage from credible sports business and news outlets indicates that penalties are typically imposed on schools and conferences, usually in the form of fines, rather than individual fan bans. For example, reporting from Sports Business Journal explains that the SEC increased fines for schools whose fans storm the field, but enforcement targets institutions, not spectators.There is no evidence from the NCAA, College Football Playoff committee, or major broadcasters (such as ESPN) confirming that fans will be banned from future games. Existing policies focus on school accountability, stadium security, and financial penalties. Sports media headlines and social media posts may exaggerate policy discussions to attract attention. Without confirmation from the NCAA itself, claims about fan bans should be treated cautiously. This claim is misleading because it suggests a definitive NCAA action against fans that is not supported by available evidence.

https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2025/05/30/sec-changes-field-storming-policy/

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (230 points)

This claim is false. There are no credible sources that say the NCAA will go so far as to ban fans for storming the field after football games. According to secondary sources like ESPN, Sports Illustrated, and AP News articles, the most that is being done right now is fining the schools. However, this fining differs by conference. There is no overall NCAA rule.

The SEC for example has said that in their conference, they will fine the schools $500,000 per incident. However, the fines can be waived if the opposing team is able to get to the locker room before the field is taken over. Commissioner Greg Sankey officially announced these changes during the 2025 SEC Spring Meetings. 

The ACC has said that if breaches of security occur, there will be "a fine that increases for each occurrence over a rolling two-year period".

The Big 12 issues fines as well. In October, 2025, the conference issued Arizona State University a $50,000 fine for field storming during a game against Texas Tech. “The Big 12 prioritizes the safety of all players, coaches and officials,” said Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark. “The Conference will continue to work with all of its institutions on event management policies at all Big 12 venues.”

These examples are all primary sources as the information comes directly from the ACC, SEC, and BIG 12 websites where they release their news and interviews with people who create and enforce these rules.

Overall, there is no official rule in place that can ban fans for running down onto the field, there is only speculation and rumors. Although field storming can be dangerous, the most that is in place right now are fines.

There are no potential biases in this information as all of these rules and implementations come from reputable sources, and are not debatable. These are real rules that have been put in place and can be viewed on all official athletic conference websites.

https://arkansasrazorbacks.com/new-field-rush-policy-in-place-for-2025-season/

https://theacc.com/news/2025/7/22/general-acc-announces-new-safety-and-well-being-policies-for-2025-26-year.aspx

https://big12sports.com/news/2025/10/21/football-big-12-announces-public-reprimand-and-fine-of-arizona-state.aspx

https://www.secsports.com/news/2024/10/what-theyre-saying-greg-sankey

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45380660/sec-increases-fines-500k-rushing-field-court

False

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...