After reading through this particular claim, it was found to be true due to the amount of evidence that backs it up. However, the information for it has come from numerous sources/articles and not just the two mentioned above. For starters, while yes there is numerous mentions of how Shein themselves are involved in controversy due to numerous reasons, from their cheap and easy-made items being used and thrown away after one use to forced labor practices, there seems to be even more underneath the surface. For instance, BBC goes on to comment about how even with listing and selling shares in the business portion of the London Stock Exchange, it doesn't necessarily mean the company will actually end up listing there. This is in part because a company that wishes to sell its shares in the UK must first apply to the FCA in order for its financial information to be approved (BBC, 2024). However, even with the allegations of forced labor and the possibility of lost revenue due to smaller packages being sent, London is still willing to take Shein in due to the number of high-profile companies leaving the area and trading in for the U.S. instead. Thus, by taking a closer look at Shein's practices and taking everything they know in with caution, it could [hopefully] help ensure that the company becomes more transparent when out on the public market (BBC, 2024). Not only that, but it was initially thought that Shein would instead go for listing in the U.S. after applying the year beforehand; however, both the Republican and Democratic parties posed concerns about the company's close relations with China. Yet, the company has denied this among other things, saying that there's a "zero-tolerance policy" for the types of issues that Shein has been presenting -- including sourcing cotton for products from only approved regions (BBC, 2024). Speaking of which, CNBC goes into explanation about how due to Shein struggling to list in London, it's caused the company to shift its attention to Hong Kong instead in order to put pressure on the issue of not getting listed soon enough. Plus, groups/organizations such as the Financial Conduct Authority has to make sure that investors are first and foremost protected in regards to their interests, which is another hurdle that Shein would have to pass in order to even be listed in the first place -- meaning, Shein may end up losing out on investments as well due to this very reasoning and all of the issues that surround them (CNBC, 2025). Morningstar also goes on to add onto that note that "it's not unusual for UK-listed companies to carry legal risks globally, at least as long as those same issues are disclosed so that said investors (as mentioned) can make informed decisions" (Morningstar, 2024). With all of this in mind, the accusation claims definitely seem to add up to the point that Shein isn't taking any accountability behind the actions that activist groups and the like are bringing up, which could potentially make it harder for the business to make any progress in regards to their stock in national markets. Thus, losing out on potential income and business partners alike. Plus with all of these points of view, it shows that there is some truth behind the matter even with each article presenting their own information on the situation at hand.
Sources used:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9xx8l600z6o
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/08/shein-files-for-hong-kong-ipo-in-hopes-of-salvaging-london-listing-ft-report.html
https://global.morningstar.com/en-gb/markets/fca-signals-it-will-support-2025-shein-ipo