College students overwhelmingly believe their university should regulate generative-AI tools rather than ban them.

Question

A recent study surveying students across 24 Italian universities found that about 69.2 % of respondents used generative AI (GenAI) for personal projects, but only 38.7 % used it for academic tasks. Many expressed ethical concerns and preferred that their institutions implement regulation rather than blanket bans. Nature For a college audience, this is especially relevant: as GenAI becomes part of assignments, creativity, and job preparation, knowing how peers think about it, and how universities respond, matters for your academic policy and personal choices.
The claim is accurate in capturing the preferred regulation stance and usage numbers. The nuance: this study was based in Italy and may not map perfectly to U.S. campuses; definitions of “regulate” vs “ban” vary. But it gives strong insight into how students feel, and thus is important to fact-check before accepting sweeping statements about GenAI policy and student behavior.

Answer 1

College students overall want to see their universities respond to AI use, but banning AI is unpopular. Students would prefer their universities to educate students on the ethical use of AI and to set clear, standardized policies for its use.
 

There are many sources on this topic, but most are secondary sources that respond to the findings of other studies. Most of the available information concerns the effects of AI on education, not on students' opinions.

Here is the primary source I found that concludes their study's findings:

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/students/academics/2025/08/29/survey-college-students-views-ai#:~:text=Some%2097%20percent%20believe%20that,AI%20tools%20can%20be%20used.

This study asked college students to respond to a variety of questions regarding AI use and higher education.

Bias: Although this source surveyed students across university types and across the country, there's always the possibility of sampling bias and survey design bias.
 

Evidence:

- This source supports the idea that students are forming strong opinions of AI use in higher education.

- This source does not support the claim that students would prefer to see AI used in higher education. This source suggests that most students would prefer to be taught how to use AI ethically at university.

7. Not able to contact.