0 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Newbie (300 points)

OpenAI recently lost a battle in court against The New York Times as part of their ongoing copyright infringement lawsuit. As a result, a federal judge has ordered the company to produce 20 million ChatGPT logs for lawyers of The New York Times to analyze as part of their investigations. However, OpenAI has openly opposed this ruling, arguing the forced productions of these logs is not justified by "common sense". 

A recent article from Business Insider also shared that OpenAI shared a public statement titles "Fighting the New York Times' invasion of user privacy". The company fails to acknowledge the recent loss against the New York Times in court. Finally, as a part of her decision, Magistrate Judge Ona Wang said OpenAI had failed to adequately protect the privacy of its consumers. 

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Newbie (300 points)

The claim of this post is that OpenAI refuses to share ChatGPT user logs with the New York Times. After reviewing multiple sources, including coverage of the lawsuit between OpenAI and the New York Times, I can agree that this claim is mostly true. OpenAI has stated that it protects user privacy and does not voluntarily share chat logs, arguing that doing so would violate user trust and privacy policies. Reports explain that OpenAI resisted the request unless legally compelled, which supports the claim that the company refused to share logs under normal circumstances.

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...