Factcheck this

Disney is losing $30 million a week because of Youtube TV

2 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Newbie (200 points)
The claim that Disney is losing $30 million a week from Youtube TV not showing their videos is not the entirety of the story. Disney pulled all of its channels from the Youtube TV platform including all ESPN and ABC channels, two of the nations biggest networks. This is because Disney believes Youtube TV is not paying them a fair market price for their channels, though they are losing even more money by pulling all their channels. Youtube TV feels they can't pay Disney's asking prices for their channels as they would have to increase their subscription price to over $20 a month, more than the average person would be willing to pay.

Disney's greediness with their asking prices is only hurting their company more as they now have lost all revenue from Youtube TV, equating to the $30 million a month figure. Youtube TV is also taking a big hit from this dispute as their users don't feel the subscription price is worth it without access to Disney's channels. Because of this, they have issued a $20 credit to all Youtube TV users to make up for the temporary channel shutdown on the platform.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/disney-losing-30m-week-youtube-tv-blackout-drags-on-analysts-say

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by (140 points)
Disney did, in fact, lose about $30 million per week, but this evidence was coming from a Morgan Stanley analyst, and not Disney itself. Multiple outlets reported that Disney was losing about $4.3 million a day, which closely aligns with the $30 million a week presented in this claim. The dispute was over a carriage negotiation regarding ESPN and ABC, and how those networks have been kept off of YouTube TV since October 30th. From the Disney press release (Nov. 14, 2025), we can see that Disney announced a multi-year distribution agreement with YouTube TV after the blackout ended. Disney's leadership frames the resolution as evidence of the "tremendous value" of its programming and commitment to evolving with audience viewing habits. This serves as a primary source, showing how Disney publicly announced the dispute and resolution.

At the same time, the press release supports evidence that undermines the claim that Disney is being "greedy". Disney positions the agreement as a long-term deal that benefits both companies and adapts to audience viewing habits, rather than just an attempt to earn more money. When we look at the press release, Business Insider, and Fox Business, we can see that all outlets confirm both companies suffered losses and publicly blamed each other. In the end, this complicates the narrative that one side is the only one at fault.

https://www.businessinsider.com/disney-loss-estimate-youtube-tv-dispute-espn-morgan-stanley-2025-11

https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/disney-losing-30m-week-youtube-tv-blackout-drags-on-analysts-say

https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/press-releases/the-walt-disney-company-announces-multi-year-distribution-agreement-with-youtube-tv/
Exaggerated/ Misleading

Categories

Community Rules

• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
Snow Theme by Q2A Market
Powered by Question2Answer
...