Trump asks Supreme Court to overturn verdict that he sexually abused and defamed E. Jean Carroll

Question

Donald Trump has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a $5 million verdict that found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. On November 10, 2025, Trump’s legal team filed a request asking the Supreme Court to review the civil case in which a jury concluded he assaulted Carroll in a Manhattan department store in the 1990s and later defamed her by publicly denying the allegations. The appeal argues that the trial judge made “indefensible evidentiary rulings,” including allowing testimony from other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct and permitting jurors to view the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape.

Lower courts, including a federal appeals panel, previously upheld the verdict, rejecting Trump’s claims of judicial error. Carroll’s legal team maintains the case was properly tried and believes the Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene.

Answer 1

The claim of this post is that President Trump asked the Supreme Court to overturn the verdict that found him guilty of sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll. After reviewing multiple sources, including the original CNN article provided in the post, I can agree that this claim is true. CNN provides evidence sharing testimony given by Trump, "'There were no eyewitnesses, no video evidence, and no police report or investigation,' Trump told the Supreme Court in the appeal filed Monday viewed by CNN." This proves an appeal was filed, and then mentions that the appeal was not formally docketed by the court. This is supported by many other articles.
Sources:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/10/politics/e-jean-carroll-trump-supreme-court

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0egyzm5yjo

Answer 2

The claim of this post is that President Trump asked the Supreme Court to overturn the verdict that found him guilty of sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll. After reviewing multiple sources, including the original CNN article provided in the post, I can agree that this claim is true. CNN provides evidence sharing testimony given by Trump, stating, “‘There were no eyewitnesses, no video evidence, and no police report or investigation,’ Trump told the Supreme Court in the appeal filed Monday viewed by CNN.” This confirms that an appeal was filed, although the article also notes that the appeal had not yet been formally docketed. This information is supported by multiple other reputable news outlets.