There is evidence from multiple credible sources that tactics used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and related federal immigration enforcement agents have drawn serious concern for being more forceful and hostile in recent years, especially as enforcement has intensified. Journalists, civil rights groups, and legal observers have reported numerous protests and legal challenges over what they describe as aggressive tactics, including the use of pepper balls, tear gas, projectiles, and other forceful measures against demonstrators and civilians during immigration operations and protests. Local reporting documented cases where ICE agents’ actions, such as shooting a pepper ball that hit a reporter and other instances of force at protests near ICE facilities, raised questions about escalation in how force is applied compared with past enforcement practices, and civil liberties advocates have called some of these actions excessive (opb.org).
There have also been public responses and legal actions. Civil rights groups filed a lawsuit over ICE’s policy of entering homes without judicial warrants, which critics say could lead to more confrontational encounters, and judges have placed temporary limits on the use of chemical agents after reports of force against protesters, including elderly civilians and journalists (apnews.com).
At the same time, available data on assaults against ICE agents is mixed. Federal reports of sharp percentage increases have been cited, but analyses of court records show that those percentage increases come from relatively small absolute numbers, making it difficult to assess whether overall violence is rising across all enforcement contexts (cpr.org).
Overall, credible reporting and legal developments show that there is increased scrutiny and concern about ICE’s enforcement tactics and their potential for violence or hostility in specific operations, but broader national data on trends in violence are still incomplete and contested.